Deprecated: preg_split(): Passing null to parameter #2 ($subject) of type string is deprecated in /home/u195173488/domains/menxonsgrantenergy.org/public_html/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 3479

Deprecated: preg_split(): Passing null to parameter #2 ($subject) of type string is deprecated in /home/u195173488/domains/menxonsgrantenergy.org/public_html/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 3479
Skip to main content

AG-Cycle is an important driving technological force that will dramatically reshape the automotive industry in the nearest future.

There are two major factors constraining proliferation of electric vehicles (EVs): range anxiety and high cost of EVs. AG-Cycle can alleviate both of them without degrading EVs’ fuel economy by means of reducing capacity of Li-ion battery; retrofitting an EV with a gas turbine range extender, enhanced with AG-Cycle and supplemented with high power, low energy ultra-capacitor pack.

Although substituting reciprocating IC engine range extender installed on an EV with a gas turbine range extender, enhanced with AG-Cycle, is possible too, and would substantially reduce fuel costs, it seems a less appealing option, because such an EV won’t be much cheaper than an authentic vehicle.

Estimates show that fuel costs for EVs with gas turbine range extender, enhanced with AG-Cycle, further referred to as AG-EVs, will be lower than fuel (electricity) cost for EVs equivalent in class and pick-up time. Also, AG-EV will have a lower carbon dioxide footprint than an equivalent EV.This means that sooner rather than later AG-EVs will take over the entire automobile market, including EVs.

Analysis of fuel economy of AG-EVs needs to be started with the comparative analysis of fuel economy of a conventional reciprocating IC engine vehicle and that of its electric equivalent, similar in class and pick-up time.

Several companies are currently doing R&D of gas turbine range extenders for EVs; some are already marketing it. For example, Delta Motorsport, UK, has developed 35 kW MiTRE gas turbine range extender; Mitsubishi, JP, unveiled Mi-Tech EV with 30 kW gas turbine range extender; Wrightspeed, US, touts its proprietary 80 kW Fulcrum gas turbine as part of its plug-in hybrid powertrain platform for 3–6 class trucks; ICR Turbine Engine Corporation, US, is currently testing its 350 kW gas turbine for 8 class trucks.

Although all aforementioned gas turbines are internally fired, at least the first three of them may be re-designed to a respective externally-fired modification with only moderate efforts. Such re-design would involve substitution of an authentic burner with a ceramic high temperature heat exchanger fired by AG-Burner.

If a conventional internally fired AG-gas turbine is to be enhanced with AG-Cycle, and weight/size are critical factors, AG-Burner needs to be retrofitted in place of an authentic burner. Depending on gas turbine’s combustion chamber design, such modification might require a comprehensive R&D. Here is an example of how 2020 Tesla 3 Standard Range’s performance and fuel economy would have changed, should the vehicle have been supplemented with externally fired AG-gas turbine range extender based on 35 kW MiTRE.

Since in freight truck business the percentage of fuel costs in overall expenses is high, and typically vary between 21 and 39%,  depending on average annual diesel price, electrification of 8-class trucks is highly prioritized by truck manufacturing industry, because electric trucks (ET)’ fuel cost is around 50% lower that that of a conventional diesel engine truck. Today, all of 10 major truck producers are either working on electric trucks or manufacture them.

The major problems with heavy trucks electrification are high weight of batteries (at least 3,000 kg) and relatively low range (300 mi), not to mention high cost of a battery pack (at least $48,000). In this respect, AG-gas turbine range extender will effectively alleviate these problems.